How do you, both, demand that God is superfluous because evolution explains life and also demand that evolution has nothing to say about life’s origins?
You become an Atheist evolutionist and refuse to be confused by your own inconsistency or by facts.
Here is an article on this issue: Darwinian evolution and life's origins, abiogenesis
This is a unique documentary for various reasons such as it being Illustra Media’s first Blue-Ray DVD release as well as the fact that:
…for decades, the production of wildlife documentaries has been almost exclusively the domain of National Geographic and the BBC (Nova, Nature, etc).
Their films are brilliantly produced, with stunning photography and riveting stories. Yet, almost invariably, they are based upon the premise that all life on Earth is the product of blind, undirected materialistic processes.
In this segment, we learn the following scientific facts:
...You think that maybe Mariano can get that thru his thick skull!
We are wrapping up our balloting for Science Club of Long Island Inc's Horse's Ass of the Year Award right now Mariano looks like sure winner!
Allegedly, documents are, allegedly, being, allegedly, withheld for fear, allegedly, fear of evidence of such censorship—allegedly.
This is the report:
Discovery Institute has filed a lawsuit against the California Science Center (the "Center") for unlawfully refusing to disclose public documents requested by Discovery Institute under the California Public Records Act.
FYI: I just finished posting a series dealing with an ubiquitously promulgated well within the box atheist talking point de jour which is the claim—popularized by Richard Dawkins, his cult of personality hero worship adherents, et al.—that “God did it” is a science stopper.
Imagine being so shockingly ignorant of 1) the very foundations upon which science is premised and 2) the fact that most of the world’s most erudite scientists have been Jews and Christians and you get a taste of what it is like to be a New Atheist.
Richard Dawkins stated that his new book The Greatest Show on Earth “is not intended as an antireligious book.” Well, considering that for him Darwinian evolution has always been about warding off God his intentionality came to naught as he simply could not help himself.
Considering that the book in expressed in atheistic evangelistic terms which run from “Evolutionary Theodicy” to the call to conversion to a “Grandeur View of Life” Dawkins has produced another anti-religious pro atheistic polemic.
John J. May was due to publish a book titled, “The Origin of Specious Nonsense.” I know not of him nor his book but the fracas surrounding him and his book may be of interest.
John Horgan wrote:
Early in his career, the philosopher Karl Popper…called evolution via natural selection "almost a tautology" and "not a testable scientific theory but a metaphysical research program."
Attacked for these criticisms, Popper took them back.
But when I interviewed him in 1992, he blurted out that he still found Darwin's theory dissatisfying. "One ought to look for alternatives!"
You have to love the feisty self-important nature of a young student’s zeal without knowledge. Yes, they get a mere taste of freedom, abscond my good ol' mommy’s apron strings and after one or two classes are quite prepared to give the world what f'r.