Richard Dawkins, the Cowardly Clown

Debates will not solve this issue. If Dawkins absolutely crushed his opponents in every debate, it wouldn't change anybody in the audience's mind. People aren't swayed by debates on issues like this and Dawkins knows it.

Furthermore, thanks to Creationists developing dubious debate methods, like the Gish Gallop, it really isn't worth debating them in the first place. They aren't going to argue against evolution because they don't really understand it, they're going to try to paint their opponent as immoral for being an atheist, and the religious people in the audience will dogmatically insist that their side is the winning side even if the atheist manages to destroy their argument.

Debates aren't where science happens. Science happens in a lab, not with two people arguing with each other on a stage.

I've noticed that you haven't responded to any of the comments I've made on your website, is it because you're too cowardly to debate me on your own website?

Also, you continually assert that atheism is without logic or reason, but you never say why, you just keep saying that this is the case, like if you say it enough it will be true.

Religion is without logic or reason. "AN INVISIBLE, ALL POWERFUL THING DID IT!" Where's the direct evidence for this? How come we never manage to get even the slightest glimpse of this all powerful invisible man and why is it that slowly, but surely, the things we thought that this invisible man did, like blasting things with bolts of lightning, are being proved to be natural phenomenon with much better explanations than "an invisible sky man did it"?

Deities and supernatural powers do not exist, and even if they did, they appear to do so little in this universe as to be meaningless and safely ignored, and this is an easy place to get to if you use the logic and reasoning of positivism or empiricism or materialism.

Mariano Grinbank, the clownish coward, who won't respond to comments on his blog and who continually practices truth by assertion. You're an idiot, sir.

Has it occurred to you that some of these famous atheists, who have very busy schedules, must sometimes attend to things more important than debating with closed minded theists? Dan Barker, for instance, runs an organization with several pending court cases.

Unless you wish to simply attack atheists from behind a keyboard, I recommend you try calling the Atheist Experience, Rationally Speaking, or Skeptically Speaking. All respond to theists like yourself who want to shove a piece of your mind down our throats.