The first answer to the question “What Is A Freethinker?” at least according to the Barkerian Sect’s definition, is that the concept and term “Freethinker” is oxymoronic. As we shall see, this particular, and peculiar, sect are a rigidly controlled group who follow authoritarian dogma.
One answer to the question offered in the tract is as follows:
“A person who forms opinions about religion on the basis of reason, independently of tradition, authority, or established belief.”
According to this definition I and many people of whom I am aware are Freethinkers.
Although, “established belief” is a tricky term. Does it mean that if a belief has been established on the basis of reason, independently of tradition or authority I cannot hold to the belief and at the same time be a Freethinker? What if atheism is considered an “established belief” would I not be able to be both a Freethinker and an atheist at the same time? Apparently I could since the next sentence states,
“Freethinkers include atheists, agnostics and rationalists.”
Incidentally, while, as we shall see, Dan Barker and the FFRF have a very dogmatic and authoritarian definition of that a “Freethinker” is this conflicts with American Atheist webmaster’s dogmatic and authoritarian definition of that an “atheist” is:
“Atheists are NOT ‘secular humanists’, ‘freethinkers’, ‘rationalists’ or ‘ethical culturalists’_Often, people who are Atheists find it useful to masquerade behind such labels.”1
Non-theism’s various sects often excommunicate each other in their zealous proselytizing.
It is interesting to note that Dan Barker wrote:
“No one can tell you what to think. Not your teachers. Not your parents. Not your minister, priest, or rabbi. Not your friends or relatives. Not this book. You are the boss of your own mind. If you have used your own mind to find out what is true, then you should be proud! Your thoughts are free!”
It would appear that one thing missing form the above statement is “No one can tell you what to think. Not even Nontract #11” since this tract is rigidly dogmatic as exampled in the following authoritative pronouncement:
“No one can be a freethinker who demands conformity to a bible, creed, or messiah. To the freethinker, revelation and faith are invalid, and orthodoxy is no guarantee of truth.”
Freethough is though which is contained within a narrowly defined parameter of assertions, presuppositions and anathemas. In a latter section of the tract we learn that with regards to morality:
“Individuals are free to choose, within the limits of humanistic morality.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby. If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help. Here is my donate/paypal page.
Due to robo-spaming, I had to close the comment sections. However, you can comment on my Facebook page and/or on my Google+ page. You can also use the “Share / Save” button below this post.