“Signature of Controversy,” Stephen Meyer, et al. – Free eBook Download

Your inability to think outside of idiot superstition is loud and clear. I determine what I should or should not believe by careful analysis of the facts. In my experience, the side of the argument most capable of expressing itself mathematically is usually the correct side. Evolution and the big bang theory both have mathematical evidence on their side, Genesis does not.
That's not how actual science works. Scientific theories are modified in light of new evidence all the time. Clearly you aren't a scientist, and don't understand the theory of evolution or the big bang theory.
Evolution is not an extinct theory, or else it wouldn't be the dominant paradigm of thought within the study of biology. I have no vested political interest in the theory of evolution, apart from wanting this nation's youth to be taught actual science in science classes, not religion re-branded as such. To do otherwise will prevent America from being competitive in the sciences (and therefore technology) in the future.
This step beyond the origin of species is exactly what makes intelligent design non-falsifiable and hence, not science, but religion. It proposes a supernatural explanation, which isn't an explanation at all. Imagine if you replaced germ theory with the idea that some supernatural force decides who gets sick and who doesn't. How does that help us prevent or cure illness?
The nature of reality indicates no such thing, as if these variables were any different and life still existed, you'd claim that these new variables were necessary for life to exist. I'm curious as to what you think qualifies as a "variable necessary for life to exist", as I'm fairly confident I could list at least one organism that violates any necessary variables you list.
There is no evidence that humanity is in any way special, any more than an individual ant is special. Science works based on evidence, not simply what is convenient or reassuring to believe. If there was evidence we were in someway special, then scientists would incorporate this into scientific theories, but in light of the lack of evidence for this assertion, we remain cosmologically bland and distinctly not special.
Doesn't matter what Einstein said about god, as that's not scientific nor relevant to the issue at hand and your attempt to make this weak argument from authority shows how incapable you are of actually debating this logically.
No, nobody thought the Earth was flat, apart from complete idiots. The Greeks understood that the Earth was round, and had proved it mathematically well before the time of Jesus Christ.
The biggest group of people who claimed that the Earth was the center of the Universe much longer than the scientific community did was the Catholic church, and they made this claim for several hundred years after Galileo had proved otherwise.
It's obvious you don't really understand the theory of evolution and you're not a scientist, which makes me wonder why you think you know better. Insane hubris seems the most likely answer, but you might just be incredibly stupid too.